The AI revolution has a dirty little secret: most organizations can't actually use it for their most important work. Sure, ChatGPT is great for brainstorming blog post ideas or debugging code snippets, but ask a hospital administrator if they'll send patient records to OpenAI's servers, or a financial services firm if they'll pipe proprietary trading strategies through Claude, and you'll get a nervous laugh followed by a long explanation about HIPAA, GDPR, and why the compliance team has nightmares.
Every paste into a cloud AI service is essentially handing your data to someone else's computer. For casual use, that's fine. For analyzing confidential legal contracts, health records, financial documents, or proprietary research? That's a compliance nightmare wrapped in a security incident waiting to happen.
Enter OnPrem.LLM, a Python-based toolkit that lets you run large language models entirely on your own hardware—no cloud required, no data leaving your building, no vendor lock-in. Created by Arun Maiya and inspired by privateGPT, OnPrem.LLM has quietly become one of the more practical solutions for organizations that need LLM capabilities but can't stomach the security implications of cloud AI. Where privateGPT pioneered the concept of local-only LLM deployment, OnPrem.LLM expands it into a full-featured document intelligence platform with a pragmatic twist: it supports both local and cloud models, giving you the flexibility to choose based on data sensitivity rather than forcing dogmatic localism.
Think of it as the "just run it yourself" answer to enterprise AI anxiety.
Flexibility without the vendor handcuffs
What makes OnPrem.LLM particularly clever is its Swiss Army knife approach to model backends. It supports:
- Local options: llama.cpp (GGUF format), Hugging Face Transformers, Ollama, vLLM, or any REST API endpoint you care to point at
- Cloud options: OpenAI GPT-4o, Anthropic Claude, AWS GovCloud, Azure OpenAI
Yes, a tool called "OnPrem" also works with cloud services. The point isn't dogmatic localism; it's choice. Run sensitive analysis locally, but use cloud models for testing or generating synthetic training data. Mix and match as needed. Switch backends with literally one line of code.
# Local model
llm = LLM('ollama/llama3.2')
# Cloud model (with stern warning about data leaving premises)
llm = LLM('anthropic/claude-3-7-sonnet-latest')This "works with everything" philosophy extends to vector databases (Chroma, Elasticsearch), document formats (PDF, Word, PowerPoint, with OCR support), and deployment options (local scripts, Web UI, REST APIs). It's refreshingly unopinionated but well-documented infrastructure.
RAG without the PhD
The toolkit's killer feature is its dead-simple approach to Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG)—the technique where an LLM queries your documents before answering questions. This is how you avoid hallucinations and get models to actually cite their sources.
Here's the entire workflow:
from onprem import LLM
llm = LLM('ollama/llama3.2')
llm.ingest('/path/to/your/documents')
result = llm.ask('What did the Q3 report say about revenue?')That's it. Three lines. The system chunks your documents, builds a vector database (your choice of dense or sparse), and answers questions with source citations. No fiddling with embeddings, no manual prompt engineering, no doctorate in computer science required.
Behind the scenes, OnPrem.LLM handles document parsing (including tables and scanned PDFs via OCR), semantic search, and prompt construction. For power users, there are knobs to turn—custom chunking strategies, Markdown-aware parsing for better structure preservation, table extraction using transformer models—but the defaults work surprisingly well.
That simplicity doesn't mean it's shallow. Under the hood, OnPrem.LLM hides a surprising amount of depth.
The features that actually matter
Beyond basic Q&A, OnPrem.LLM includes genuinely useful capabilities:
Document summarization: Map-reduce or concept-focused summaries that can handle 100+ page PDFs. Want to know everything a research paper says about "quantum entanglement"? One function call.
Information extraction: Pull structured data from unstructured text. Extract names, dates, dollar amounts, or anything else matching a pattern across thousands of pages. Particularly useful for contract analysis or regulatory compliance.
Few-shot classification: Train text classifiers with as few as 5 examples per category and hit 98% accuracy. No massive labeled datasets required.
Structured outputs: Force the LLM to return data in a specific format using Pydantic models or regex constraints. Great for downstream automation where you can't tolerate freeform text.
Agent-based workflows: Chain together multi-step reasoning and tool use. Think "analyze this webpage and extract pricing info" without manual scripting.
The performance reality check
Let's be honest: local LLMs aren't as capable as GPT-4 or Claude. They're smaller, they hallucinate more, and they struggle with complex reasoning. But for many enterprise use cases—document search, information extraction, simple classification, summarization—they're "good enough," especially when weighted against the alternative of not being able to use AI at all.
In practical terms, a 7B-parameter model running via Ollama on a consumer GPU (say, an NVIDIA RTX 4060) can handle document Q&A for 20-page PDFs in under ten seconds—plenty fast for day-to-day analysis work. Ingestion is even quicker with sparse vector stores: a 100-document collection indexed in under a minute. For production workloads requiring higher throughput, vLLM can serve models at 10x the speed of standard inference engines.
The toolkit helps bridge the capability gap through quantization support. Modern 8B parameter models quantized to 4-bit precision can run on consumer GPUs with 6GB of VRAM. A mid-range laptop becomes a viable document intelligence platform. Performance tuning is surprisingly approachable: set n_gpu_layers=-1 to use your GPU, supply store_type='sparse' for faster ingestion at the cost of some retrieval quality, and adjust context windows based on your hardware. The documentation actually explains these tradeoffs instead of hand-waving them away.
Who actually needs this?
OnPrem.LLM shines in scenarios where data governance trumps absolute model quality:
- Healthcare: Analyze patient records, research papers, or clinical trial data without HIPAA violations
- Legal: Contract analysis, case law research, regulatory compliance checks
- Finance: Proprietary trading research, customer data analysis, regulatory reporting
- Government: Anything touching classified or sensitive information (the recent AWS GovCloud support signals this use case)
- Research: Academic work requiring data privacy or working with embargoed datasets
It's also valuable for smaller organizations that can't justify enterprise cloud AI contracts. A startup with proprietary data but limited budgets can run sophisticated document intelligence on a single server instead of paying per-token fees. That alone may justify the setup cost for many firms.
The ecosystem play
What's interesting about OnPrem.LLM is how it's evolved beyond simple prompting. Recent updates added SharePoint integration (because of course enterprises store everything in SharePoint), Elasticsearch support for semantic search at scale, and agent-based task solving. There's a built-in Web UI for non-technical users. You can define complex analysis pipelines via YAML configs.
This is the kind of boring infrastructure work that actually enables AI adoption. It's not sexy—there's no buzzword-laden whitepaper about "revolutionary architectures"—but it solves real problems for real users.
The catches
No tool is perfect. OnPrem.LLM requires genuine technical chops to deploy and maintain. You need to understand model quantization, vector databases, GPU memory management, and prompt engineering. The flexibility comes at the cost of complexity—there are about seven different ways to specify a model backend, which is powerful but can be confusing.
Local LLMs also mean local responsibilities. You're managing model weights, handling updates, monitoring performance, and dealing with the occasional "CUDA out of memory" error at 3 AM. For many organizations, this is actually preferable to cloud dependency, but it's not zero effort.
As with most open AI infrastructure, expect the occasional GitHub issue, model compatibility surprise, or the need to rebuild llama-cpp-python with specific CMAKE flags. The documentation is solid and the community responsive, but you're still operating in the wilder corners of the AI ecosystem.
The bigger picture
OnPrem.LLM represents a quiet but important countertrend in AI: the recognition that not everything needs to run in someone else's cloud. As AI capabilities become increasingly commoditized—you can download GPT-4-class models for free now—the competitive advantage shifts to control: control over your data, control over costs, control over deployment.
For organizations that value these things more than having the absolute bleeding-edge model, tools like OnPrem.LLM aren't just viable alternatives. They're the only reasonable choice.
The project is actively maintained (latest update was August 2025 adding AWS GovCloud support), has comprehensive documentation, and solves real problems without requiring a team of MLOps engineers to babysit it. In an AI landscape increasingly dominated by closed platforms and vendor lock-in, that's worth celebrating.
OnPrem.LLM is open source and available on GitHub under an Apache 2.0 license. Full documentation and installation instructions are at the project's documentation site.
Unlock the Future of Business with AI
Dive into our immersive workshops and equip your team with the tools and knowledge to lead in the AI era.
