When Andrej Karpathy, OpenAI co-founder and former Tesla AI director, coined the term "vibe coding" in February 2025, describing it as a process where "you fully give in to the vibes, embrace exponentials, and forget that the code even exists," he probably didn't expect to spawn an entire cleanup industry. Yet that's exactly what happened.
Today, if you search LinkedIn for "Vibe Coding Cleanup Specialist," you'll find dozens of programmers advertising their services as digital janitors for the AI coding revolution. As one developer colorfully put it: "These cleanup specialists are like the superhero janitors of the programming world. While everyone is having fun with their AI assistant, someone has to explain why the contact form sends emails to Mars."
The emergence of this profession tells a story about both the promise and peril of AI-assisted programming—and reveals why the dream of "anyone can code" might be more expensive than anyone imagined.
From "The Hottest Programming Language" to Cleanup Chaos
The vibe coding phenomenon has its roots in Karpathy's prescient 2023 observation that "The hottest new programming language is English." The term was significant enough that Merriam-Webster added "vibe coding" to its dictionary as a "slang & trending" term just a month after Karpathy's February 2025 post.
In his original description, Karpathy painted vibe coding as almost magical: "I ask for the dumbest things like 'decrease the padding on the sidebar by half' because I'm too lazy to find it. I 'Accept All' always, I don't read the diffs anymore. When I get error messages I just copy paste them in with no comment, usually that fixes it."
The appeal was immediate. By March 2025, Y Combinator reported that 25% of startup companies in its Winter 2025 batch had codebases that were 95% AI-generated. Suddenly, product managers, small business owners, and complete programming novices were building functional web applications in hours rather than months.
But there was a catch—several, actually.
When the AI Party Ends
The risks became apparent quickly. Security problems could lead to an AI-programmed cooking app generating not just recipes for Thai curry or banana bread, but also step-by-step instructions for making poisonous cyanide ice cream.
Real examples of vibe coding failures paint a disturbing picture. One user proudly shared on X that he had built his entire Software-as-a-Service using the AI code editor Cursor. Just days later, he posted that his software had been hit by countless cyberattacks: "Completely random things are happening, the number of API keys is exhausted and people are bypassing the subscription."
In another case documented by The New York Times, AI-generated code fabricated fake reviews for an e-commerce site. In July 2025, a company founder documented how Replit's AI agent deleted a database despite explicit instructions not to make any changes.
Carla Rover, a web developer with 15 years of experience, captured the frustration perfectly: "Using a coding co-pilot is kind of like giving a coffee pot to a smart six-year-old and saying, 'Please take this into the dining room and pour coffee for the family.' Can they do it? Possibly. Could they fail? Definitely. And most likely, if they do fail, they aren't going to tell you."
Enter the Cleanup Specialists
This chaos created opportunity for a new breed of programmer. Hamid Siddiqi, who has been offering vibe coding cleanup services since late 2023, told 404 Media: "I currently work with around 15-20 clients regularly, with additional one-off projects throughout the year. I started fixing vibe-coded projects because I noticed a growing number of developers and small teams struggling to refine AI-generated code that was functional but lacked the polish or 'vibe' needed to align with their vision."
Siddiqi commonly deals with "inconsistent UI/UX design in AI-generated frontends, poorly optimized code that impacts performance, misaligned branding elements, and features that function but feel clunky or unintuitive."
The work is lucrative. Some specialists charge upwards of $200 per hour to untangle AI-generated messes, with reports of a 300% increase in demand over the past six months. Full-time roles command $150,000-plus salaries.
The Economics of Digital Debris
The irony is inescapable. Companies adopt vibe coding to save money by avoiding expensive programmers, only to end up paying premium rates to fix what the AI broke. One industry expert noted: "The economics of this process are simply ridiculous. Companies try to save money by letting everyone 'code like a vibe' on projects, and then have to pay twice as much for someone who is even capable of sorting out this chaos. It's like hiring the cheapest mechanic to fix a car and then wondering why the steering wheel ended up in the trunk."
Companies like Belitsoft and Pragmatic Coders have built entire business models around this. As one company describes it: "Companies increasingly turn to such specialists to rescue projects where AI code is raw, without proper architecture and security. Those who made demos now call in seniors to make the code stable and secure."
The pattern is becoming predictable: Use Cursor to build MVP lightning fast. Celebrate. Demo looks great. Push to production. Chaos begins. Pay real engineers to unfry the spaghetti. Spend more money than you would have in the first place.
The Human Factor in the AI Age
Swatantra Sohni, another cleanup specialist, observes that many vibe coders are "product managers or sales guys, or small business owners" who think they can bypass traditional development. The reality is predictable: "Vibe-coding is currently still in its infancy. It's very practical for conveying the desired prototype, but I don't believe it's really designed to create a production-ready app."
Experienced developer Feridoon Malekzadeh, who has been building with vibe-coding platform Lovable, compares the process to "hiring your stubborn, insolent teenager to help you do something. You have to ask them 15 times to do something. In the end, they do some of what you asked, some stuff you didn't ask for, and they break a bunch of things along the way."
He estimates spending "around 50% of his time writing requirements, 10% to 20% of his time on vibe coding, and 30% to 40% of his time on vibe fixing—remedying the bugs and 'unnecessary script' created by AI-written code."
The Platform Response
The cleanup crisis hasn't gone unnoticed by the platforms enabling vibe coding. Companies like Pragmatic Coders now market "Vibe Coding Rescue Services," promising to "rescue, repair, secure, and optimize AI-generated apps, turning clunky, unstable, or slow code into clean, secure, and scalable solutions ready for commercial use."
They've identified common problems: "Foggy Specs: Prompts might miss edge cases, performance needs, or compliance rules, leading to incomplete features. Hidden Bugs: AI code may look good but hide errors that surface in production. Security Slip-Ups: Risks like hard-coded keys or weak validation can creep in unnoticed. Mounting Tech Debt: Inconsistent code from repeated prompts slows updates and frustrates maintenance."
A New Development Paradigm?
Despite the problems, vibe coding continues to evolve. Industry data suggests that about 25% of new startups now use AI for roughly 95% of their code, while Google reports that AI now writes more than 30% of its new code.
Tools like Cline and Cursor are adapting to address vibe coding's limitations. As one product manager explains: "At Cline, we recognize this historical pattern. Just as C didn't eliminate assembly language but made it unnecessary for most tasks, AI won't eliminate traditional coding but will change where we spend our cognitive effort."
The key insight emerging from the cleanup specialist boom is that AI coding tools work best when guided by experienced developers who understand their limitations. As one expert puts it: "Companies are treating AI coding as a magic solution that anyone can use, when it actually requires senior-level expertise to guide it properly."
The Hangover Begins
By September 2025, outlets like Fast Company are reporting that the 'vibe coding hangover' is upon us, with senior software engineers citing 'development hell' when working with AI-generated vibe-code.
Carla Rover, who once spent 30 minutes sobbing after having to restart a vibe-coded project, reflects: "Because I needed to be quick and impressive, I took a shortcut and did not scan those files after the automated review. When I did do it manually, I found so much wrong."
The Verdict: Superhero Janitors Are Here to Stay
The rise of vibe coding cleanup specialists reveals a fundamental truth about the AI revolution: it's not replacing human expertise so much as reshuffling where that expertise is needed. As 404 Media wryly observed: "Fire human, use AI, fire AI, hire human."
The vibe coding cleanup specialist may sound like a meme job title, but it represents something deeper—the recognition that AI tools, for all their power, still need human wisdom to create software that actually works in the real world.
As the trend continues to grow, with dozens of specialists now advertising on LinkedIn and companies like Lovable becoming unicorns within 8 months, one thing is clear: someone has to clean up after the AI party. And they're getting paid very well to do it.
The question isn't whether vibe coding will survive its cleanup crisis, but whether the industry will learn to use these powerful tools more wisely—or if we'll continue to need an army of superhero janitors to keep our AI-generated digital world from falling apart.
In the meantime, if your contact form is sending emails to Mars, you know who to call.
Unlock the Future of Business with AI
Dive into our immersive workshops and equip your team with the tools and knowledge to lead in the AI era.
